Session | ||
Parties & Elections 03: Attitudes towards the EU
| ||
Presentations | ||
The (Non-)Effect of Propaganda. The Attitudes of Hungarians towards the EU Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary The paper examines the changes of the attitudes of Hungrian citizens towards various aspects of the European integration during the past two decades. Based on Eurobarometer surveys, it seems clear that the support of the European integration has remained more or less at same level in the recent years (actually since 2006) in Hungary. It raises the question whether the Eurosceptic rhetoric and communication of the current Hungarian government has not affected the attitudes of the voters. Naturally, there have been deviations over the years, but these changes were quite small. The real fall in the popularity of EU membership happened just before and right after the EU accession of the country. According to studies, this decrease was a consequence of the voters materialistic expectations regarding the EU membership. So the paper examines two important questions. What are the effects of the Eurosceptic communication of the government on the support of various aspects of the European integration? Is there a correlation between the support of the European integration and the (future) economic prospects of the voters? A Panel Data Analysis Euroscepticism in Czechia: Did the Crises Between 2019 and 2024 Lead to a Change? Masaryk University, Czech Republic Recent years have been challenging for European countries. The COVID-19 pandemic, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the energy crisis, and high inflation have all constituted major challenges for the entire European Union (EU). All these events have the potential to influence how citizens of European countries perceive the EU. Has there been a change? How much change? What explains the change? This paper will look at the case of Czechia and examine whether and how Czech citizens' attitudes toward the EU changed over the 2019-2024 time period. The paper will utilize unique longitudinal data from the Czech Household Panel Survey. The methodological advantages of longitudinal data allow observing change at the individual level of analysis. Also, studying determinants of over-time changes at the individual level allow for more confident conclusions about causality than if cross-sectional data are used. Overall, this paper will contribute to our understanding of Euroscepticism, which is especially relevant in the current time of the rising popularity of Eurosceptic political parties. |