Bringing together contributions from over 74 leading labour scholars, a volume, The Elgar Companion to Decent Work and the Sustainable Development Goals, edited by Madelaine Moore, Christoph Scherrer and Marcel van der Linden, critically investigates the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda and how it relates to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. While the mainstreaming of labour concerns into the United Nations agenda can be attributed to the ILO’s strategic focus on decent work, the world is no closer to achieving the Decent Work Agenda. The Agenda cannot be blamed for this setback. However, the persistent decent work deficits expose tremendous obstacles encountered on the way to the stated goal of achieving ‘full and productive employment and decent work for all’. Some critics argue that the concept itself needs to be re-evaluated, some see full employment as a utopian goal and look for alternatives to social inclusion, and others see the whole concept of decent work as too closely associated with the experience of rich countries where formal employment has traditionally been the norm.
While not all of these criticisms are valid, the issues raised and the reasons for the implementation deficits of the Decent Work Agenda deserve further examination. Given the unacceptably high decent work deficit and informal employment, further discussions are needed concerning the adequacy of the Decent Work Agenda as well as policies for its implementation. The contributors address these issues by interrogating the key historical, current and future challenges to the implementation of the Decent Work Agenda in our global economy.
• They critically examine the ILO's Decent Work Agenda, its historical context, its inclusion in global development goals, and the challenges in achieving decent work globally.
• Analyse the difficulties in implementing and enforcing labour standards, the limitations of corporate social responsibility, and the efficacy of trade union strategies.
• Provide diverse perspectives on the Decent Work Agenda including from a range of disciplines (political science, sociology, economics, law) alongside feminist and ecological interventions and voices from the global south.
• Look ahead to future trends in labour, including automation, the gig economy, and the impact of COVID-19, and discusses the approach to work in the next iteration of the Sustainable Development Goals post-2030.
After a brief introduction by the session chair, Christoph Scherrer (University of Kassel), five themes from the book will be presented seven minutes each, leading over to brief comments by the discussant, Nicolas Pons-Vignon (University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland) and a moderated discussion on the future of the Decent Work Agenda in an era of rising geopolitical tensions.
Themes and presenters:
1. Declining wage shares, wealth inequality and ‘living wages’
Maarten van Klaveren, WageIndicator Foundation, the Netherlands
2. The challenge of measuring underemployment
Gerhard Bosch, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
3. Digital labour platforms and their contribution to development outcomes
Uma Rani, International Labour Office
4. Decent Workplace: Evolution of the Concept and Relevance
Nausheen Nizami, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, India
5. Universal versus employment-based social protection?
Gabriele Koehler, UN Research Institute for Social Development
Discussant: Nicolas Pons-Vignon, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland
Discussion: Implications for the future of the Decent Work Agenda
Thinking through the challenges, what does the future of the Decent Work Agenda look like? In many ways, we face the same obstacles as those back in 1919 in the early days of the ILO, namely how to build workers’ power in the face of a global economic system that is structurally resistant to it. While Decent Work asserted that the world of work must include the democratic participation of workers, it is starkly clear that for this participation to be substantive, workers must have power. Tripartite agreements and institutions may provide a forum to voice workers' concerns, but there is no protection for workers' rights if states become increasingly authoritarian and explicitly aligned with the interests of capital. Must workers' demands go beyond the vague call for decent work and a seat at a table structurally designed to limit workers' power? Does the decent work agenda need concrete and far-reaching policy demands to remain relevant in the decades to come?