Session proposal
Mathieu Dupuis, Laval University
Mélanie Laroche, University of Montréal
Multiple disruptions are reshaping the world of work. These disruptions - such as the acceleration of climate change, the rise of digital technologies and major demographic changes, flexibilization and fissuring strategies – are deepening asymmetries of power between workers and their representatives, on the one hand, and firms and supply chains, on the other.
In this polycrisis context, world-of-work actors experiment a variety of actions and strategies. Approaches vary with national, industry, and organizational contexts as well as the political orientations and resources of the actors themselves. Within this context, the “better work’ framework focuses on the dimensions of risk, autonomy, and expressiveness to capture these multiple dimensions and levels of better and worse work.
Negotiated, co-constructed or imposed, experimentation stems from the various initiatives and strategies that actors put forward. While in some cases experimentation may have a positive impact on one or more dimensions of work quality, others produce no tangible results, or even lead to a general deterioration in work quality. Some experiments also produce contradictory effects, with some aspects of work improving while others deteriorate.
For example, for some employers, experimentation will be driven by the urge to increase productivity, their flexibility or even reduce their dependency on labour. For unions, experimentation for better work is a way of broadening bargaining and policy agendas and connecting with the concerns of those they represent or seek to represent. For policy makers, preoccupied by labour shortages and the impact of growing inequalities on populism and democracy, such experimentation offers an opportunity to embrace favourable working conditions as more than just an economic trickle-down effect.
The aim of this session is to better understand the effects of different disruptions the world-of-work is facing and the challenges they pose, as well as the actions and experiments deployed by actors to address them. The key is to gain a better understanding of how these strategies or any other approach to these disruptions develop and, when applicable, are institutionalized. It is also crucial to comprehend why these actions and strategies sometimes make work better and sometimes make work worse, on one or more of its dimensions.
This session will build on the CRIMT International Partnership Project on Institutional Experimentation for Better or Worse Work, which is an interuniversity, inter-disciplinary and international collaborative research network bringing together researchers from around the world to look at the challenges of institutional experimentation and renewal for work and employment.
This session aims to contribute to the debate on the capacity of institutions to deal with the polycrisis context facing labour market actors (track 3). More specifically, we are analysing the resilience of actors in the face of various crises and their ability to implement innovative solutions to enable a more equitable and inclusive world of work. We are proposing 4 papers in this session, which will address various crises, including the climate crisis, the digital revolution, Covid-19, labour shortages and even the public finance crisis. Our aim is to gain a better understanding of the factors that enable actors to better respond to these crises and ensure better work.