Conference Agenda

Session
A2 ONLINE 02.2: Israeli Education Facing Social Diversity in the Context of Immigration, 1934-1976
Time:
Thursday, 05/Sept/2024:
4:00am - 5:30am

Session Chair: Miriam Szamet, Mandel Foundation Israel
Session Chair: Natallia Vasilevich (TA), Uni Bonn

ZOOM - Meeting room 4: Meeting-ID: 837 2176 3757 Kenncode: 809810

https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83721763757?pwd=VdMSas2AGfSDQO5BYptxFbaRsG9VuB.1
Presentations

Israeli Education Facing Social Diversity in the Context of Immigration, 1934-1976

Amir Aizenman

Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel

Chair(s): Miriam Szamet (Mandel School for Educational Leadership, The Mandel Foundation Israel)

This panel will focus on educational attempts in the Israeli education system to address the challenges of immigration during the pre-state period and the first decades of the state's existence (1934-1976). The panel will cover approximately 40 years of experience at the micro and macro levels to address the challenge of diversity in education in an immigrant society, with the aim of promoting social cohesion. It will deal with different research perspectives, including pedagogical questions, questions of law and education, and questions of educational policy. The first paper delves into the Youth Aliyah project (Youth-Immigration), focusing on the assimilation of the first 60 teenagers who fled Nazi Germany for education in Palestine at Kibbutz Ein Charod in 1934. By analyzing archival evidence and personal accounts, it uncovers the complexities of integrating into the kibbutz's socialist ideology, revealing the evolving educational goals and ideological shifts within the initiative. The research highlights the tensions between communalism and individual identity, examining the successes and challenges of cultural integration within this historical context. Situated within broader discussions of diversity and education, it contributes to understanding how historical educational efforts navigated cultural plurality, shaping individual identities and societal integration. The second paper examine how legal principles were instilled in children's literature in the early years of the State of Israel. It will describe how regulating education became crucial for Israel's young state. Though pre-existing, legislative frameworks gained momentum via parliament laws and executive actions. The pioneer 1949 Compulsory Education Law ensured free primary education. The legislators intended to deal with social anxieties from idle children prone to crime. Mass immigration and diverse educational backgrounds amplified these concerns. The paper will explain how this trends of 1950s children's literature highlights the zeitgeist and targeting of Mizrahi immigrants, revealing the complex motivations behind early Israeli education policy. The third paper will focus on the comprehensive attempt to promote social cohesion through engineering the classroom composition, with the implementation of the Integration program. Launched in 1968, Israel's ambitious School-Structure Reform aimed to transform schools into spaces for social integration, bridging gaps between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jewish students. This cornerstone of the welfare state's equality policy envisioned schools as crucibles for a cohesive society. Focusing on the "integration formula", a 60:40 ratio of working-class Mizrahi to middle-class Ashkenazi students, this presentation argues that the Ministry of Education, lacking sound research, relied on intuition and value-laden principles during policy formulation and implementation. This case study exposes the tensions between aspiration and reality in educational integration efforts.

 

Presentations of the Panel

 

Navigating Diversity in Pre-State Israel: The First Year of Youth Aliyah

Miriam Szamet
Mandel School for Educational Leadership, The Mandel Foundation Israel

This study delves into the inaugural year of the Youth Aliyah initiative, focusing on the integration of approximately 60 teenage immigrants from Germany into Kibbutz Ein Charod in 1934. Led by Recha Freier and Henrietta Szold, Youth Aliyah aimed to rescue Jewish youth from Nazi Germany and facilitate their migration to Palestine for education and vocational training. Through an analysis of archival documents and personal accounts, this research illuminates the complexities of assimilation and cultural adaptation faced by these young immigrants in a new socio-political landscape. The study examines the diverse perspectives of project organizers, educational leaders, and the immigrant cohort itself, shedding light on evolving educational objectives and ideological shifts within the initiative's framework. Furthermore, it explores the tensions between socialist communal ideologies and the individual identities of the immigrant youth, highlighting the challenges and successes of the integration process. By contextualizing the experiences of the first Youth Aliyah cohort within broader discussions of diversity and education, this study contributes to a nuanced understanding of historical efforts to address cultural plurality within educational frameworks.

Bibliography

Amkraut, Brian (2006): Between Home and Homeland: Youth Aliyah from Nazi Germany. Tuscaloosa.

Gelber, Yoav (1988): The Origins of Youth Aliya. In: Studies in Zionism 9/2, S. 147-171.

Halamish, Aviva (2009): Palestine as a Destination for Jewish Immigrants and Refugees from Nazi Germany. In: Caestecker, Frank/Moore, Bob (Hg.): Refugees from Nazi Germany and the Liberal European States. New York, S. 121-150.

Meier, Axel (2004): Die Jugend-Alija in Deutschland 1932-1941. In: Gudrun Maierhof (Hg.): Aus Kindern wurden Briefe. Die Rettung jüdischer Kinder aus Nazi-Deutschland. Berlin, S. 71–94.

 

Compulsory Education Law and the Mizrahi Children in Israeli Children's Literature of the 1950s: Diversity or Unity?

Talia Diskin
The Minerva Center for the Rule of Law under Extreme Conditions, University of Haifa

Regulating education has been an important issue on the agenda since the establishment of the State of Israel. Although the field of education was greatly developed before the establishment of the state, it was subsequently given a legal push by the legislature – the Knesset – and supported by executive branch arrangements. The pioneer in regulating education was the Compulsory Education Law, one of the first laws enacted by the Knesset in general, which established free of charge basic education for children from kindergarten to age 14, in September 1949. Through the law, the legislators sought to deal with what was considered as a major problem back then – children who wandered the streets of cities, engaged in petty peddling, passed their time idle, deteriorated into crime or were suspected – due to social "moral anxiety" – of being prone to delinquency. Added to this situation was another phenomenon that affected the social climate: the Great Aliyah, which changed the demographic balance and added hundreds of thousands of Jews to the existing Jewish core at various levels of exposure to education and Moderna. This immigration turned education into a burning problem and was another source of moral anxieties among the citizens of the new state, who watched with trepidation the process of change in the society of the Yishuv they knew. The expression of the Compulsory Education Law in various sources, particularly in children's literature of the 1950s, indicates the zeitgeist and the state of mind in the fields of law and politics. Writing about it emphasizes the attitudes toward a need to improve education among all children, while emphasizing the origin of the main target audience of the law: Mizrahi Jews from Islamic countries – parents and children – and their alleged connection to crime and delinquency.

Bibliography

Susan S. Silbey, ‘After Legal Consciousness’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1 (2005), pp. 323-368.

Yadlin-Segal and Meyers, ‘Like Birds Returning to Their Nest’ – Aya Yadlin-Segal and Oren Meyers, '“Like Birds Returning to Their Nest”: Immigration Narratives and Ideological Constructions in Early Israeli Children’s Magazines', Journalism History, 40, 3 (2014), pp. 158-166.

Orit Rozin, A Home for All Jews – Orit Rozin, A Home for All Jews: Citizenship, Rights, and National Identity in the New Israeli State, Brandeis University Press, Waltham, MA 2016.

 

The 60:40 Ratio: Unveiling the Policy and Practice of Ethnic and Class Integration in Israeli Education, 1976-1966

Amir Aizenman
Ben Gurion Institute, Ben Gurion University of the Negev

The year 1968 marked the launch of Israel's ambitious School-Structure Reform, a cornerstone of the Ministry of Education's social equality policy during the golden age of the nation's welfare state. This initiative embodied the government's political aspiration to transform schools into egalitarian spaces where students from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds would purposefully, systematically, and structurally encounter one another. This encounter was named "educational integration", after the American model of school-integration. The program aimed to bridge social gaps and forge a cohesive Jewish society within the newly established nation-state. The Israeli Integration aimed for two distinct groups: Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews. This division - which originated in the different countries of origin of the Jews before the establishment of the State of Israel, on the one hand, the Islamic countries (Mizrahim), on the other hand, Europe (Ashkenazim) - not only represented contrasting ethnicities but also starkly different class realities, with Mizrahim predominantly occupying the lower working class and Ashkenazim entrenched in the middle and upper strata. My presentation delves into the intricate process of translating this multifaceted policy into practical measures on the ground. I specifically trace the genesis of the "integration Formula", the 60:40 ratio deemed ideal for balancing working-class Mizrahi students with middle-class Ashkenazi counterparts. The presentation sheds light on the rationale behind this specific ratio and explores the role played by the 1966 Coleman Report from the United States in its formulation. I will argue that the decision-making process within the Israeli Ministry of Education primarily relied on intuition rather than robust research. The translation of policy into practice, I contend, was heavily influenced by value-laden principles rather than concrete empirical data.

Bibliography

Avner Molcho, The formation of secondary education in Israel, 1948-1968, The Journal of Israeli History 29 (1), March 2010, pp. 25-45.

Karl Alexander and Stephen L. Morgan, The Coleman Report at Fifty: Its Legacy and Implications for Future Research on Equality of Opportunity, RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences 2 (5), September 2016, pp. 1-16.

John R. Logan, Weiwei Zhang, and Deirdre Oakley, Court Orders, White Flight, and School District Segregation, 1970–2010, Social Forces 95 (3), March 2017, pp. 1049-1075.