Problem Statement and Purpose
Social accountability aims to enhance the delivery of services through participatory processes. According to Claasen, Alpín-Lardiés and Ayer (2010:2), “The active participation and engagement of citizens and civil society groups in policy-making and implementation can greatly improve accountability and overall good governance”. This article focuses on social accountability in the South African context because of its increasing relevance to local governance and the country's challenges in service delivery. The South African local sphere of the government has been characterised by a plethora of challenges that limit service delivery, including an unsupportive institutional environment, negative power struggles, over-regulation, political interference, a tense and bureaucratic environment, lack of coherent management systems, absence of a culture of excellence, poor skill utilisation, poor oversight mechanisms, and a weak capacity to engage in collaborations. These problems are exemplified by growing service delivery challenges in many South African Municipalities (Shayamano, 2019). Carmago and Jacobs (2013:6), state that,
“Social accountability initiatives are increasingly expected to facilitate positive development outcomes such as more responsive local government, exposing government failure and corruption, empowering marginalised groups, and ensuring that national and local governments respond to the concerns of the poor”.
This study seeks to understand the effectiveness of social accountability using the lenses of Einstein’s Ladder of Participation. When writing this paper, no study had focused on social accountability in local rural municipalities using Arnstein’s Ladder of Citizen Participation.
Methodology
This study used a qualitative research approach and case study design, data was collected using secondary sources This study employs a documentary analysis methodology to explore the concept of social accountability using Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation as a theoretical framework. Data for this study consist of documents, reports, publications, and records related to social accountability initiatives within the chosen context. These documents include government policies, municpal reports reports, project evaluations, meeting minutes, and community feedback mechanisms. To ensure the comprehensiveness of the documentary analysis, a systematic approach was adopted. Initial document collection involve comprehensive searches of relevant databases, institutional repositories, government websites, and academic literature databases. Documents were selected based on their relevance to social accountability efforts and their potential to provide insights into the implementation of Arnstein's ladder in practice. To ensure the trustworthiness of the finding documents aere derived from reliable sources.
Findings
The study revealed that the municipality uses several social accountability mechanisms, including ward committees, imbizo and participatory budgeting. In its current form, ward committees within NLM can be said to achieve procedural participation as they do not impact any outcomes. In addition, the study argues that Imbizo, as a social accountability tool, lacks authenticity. Imbizo only allows for partial participation since not everyone is allowed to participate. Citizens within the NLM lack the necessary support and resources to engage meaningfully in the participatory budgeting process and their participation has been rendered as a symbolic gesture as they do not influence any decisions.
Proposals
This study recommends strengthening its relationship with the communities, including civil society. The municipality must develop systems that allow genuine community participation in ways beyond the tokenism level. The municipality must stop imposing decisions on the communities, such as the service level standards, to the indigents without consent or knowledge of those affected as it borders on manipulation and therapy. It is recommended that participation during imbizo, ward committee, and participatory budgeting should move towards partnership level, delegation, and citizen control, which represent the presence of public participation in effective social accountability.
References
Camargo, C.B. 2016. Social accountability: A practitioner’s handbook. Franziska Stahl.
Masiya, T., Davids, Y.D. & Mangai, M.S. 2019. Assessing service delivery: public perception of municipal service delivery in South Africa. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management. 14(2):20-40.
Ngqushwa Local Municpality. 2022. Annual Report 2021/22. Retrieved from: https://ngqushwamun.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/MPAC-Oversight-Programmes-on-2020-21-on-Annual-Report.pdf.
Shava, E and Mubangizi. B.C. 2019. Social Accountability Mechanisms in a Decentralised State: Exploring Implementation Challenges. African Journal of Governance and Development, 8 (2) PP 73- 93.