Problem Statement and Purpose
1.Problem Statement
Public administration education and training is a pioneering, fundamental, and strategic project for building a high-quality team of administrative managers, and plays an irreplaceable important role in improving social service work.In light of the evolving global scenarios, national conditions, and international relations, alongside the emerging imperative to reinforce and refine public administrative education and training, thereby elevating the competencies and qualifications of cadres, a more nuanced alignment of supply and demand within the realm of public administrative education and training is imperative. This alignment is crucial to fulfilling the demands of organizations, job functions, and leadership roles. As the two major countries in the world, China and the United Kingdom have significant differences in their public administration education and training systems and mechanisms. How to continuously enhance the systematic, targeted, and effective nature of education and training through comparative analysis and research, which has become critical global concerns that public service leaders must deal with.
2.Purpose
This paper is based on the author's comparative analysis and research of the systems and mechanisms of public administrative education and training in China and the UK. Based on his exchange visit and research in the Global Development and Prospects Program at Oxford University, the author proposes his insights into optimizing the education and training of public administrative cadres, aiming to address the current challenges faced by global public administrative cadres in education and training, and to ensure the provision of effective, efficient, and economical service delivery.
Methodology
This article adopts a research design that combines qualitative and comparative analysis methods, utilizing meta-analysis to synthesize and statistically analyze the findings of multiple published studies. The aim is to summarize the different effects of educational training practices between China and the United Kingdom and to assess the consistency and effectiveness among various studies. Although meta-analysis may not provide precise interpretations for the research content of this article, they do raise the understanding and increases insight of public administrative educators.
Findings
Given the substantial differences between China and the UK in terms of history and culture, national systems, civil service systems, and many other aspects, there are considerable variations and unique characteristics in public administrative education and training in the following areas: (1) political organizational requirements, (2) focus on capacity development orientation, (3) degree of marketization of education and training institutions, and (4) flexibility of education and training methods,etc.
Proposals
The history of human social development tells us that openness brings progress, while closure inevitably leads to backwardness. We can actively learn from the characteristics and experiences of public administration education and training in China and the UK, and establish a more comprehensive global cadre education and training system. The main tasks include but are not limited to improving relevant laws and regulations, emphasizing the ability orientation of civil servant training, accelerating the marketization process of training institutions, enriching the methods and content of civil servant training, and establishing supporting incentive mechanisms for civil servant training.
References
[1] Zhou Minkai. A Comparative Study of Civil Servant Systems [M]. Fudan University Press, 2006 , 149
[2] Huang Weiping, Tan Gongrong. A Comparative Study of Civil Servant Systems [M]. Central Compilation & Translation Press, 2002, 328
[3] Li Hezhong. A Comparative Study of Civil Servant Systems [M]. The Publishing House of the Party School of the Central Committee of the CPC, 2003 , 93
[4] Jia Yongshuai. The British Civil Servant Training System and Its Implications for China [D]. Changchun, Jilin, School of Public Administration, Jilin University, 2009.05
[5] Jiang Hairu. A Comparative Study of Chinese and Foreign Civil Servant Systems [M]. The Commercial Press, 2003,178
[6] Du Baoyou. Experience and Inspiration from Foreign Civil Servant Training Quality Evaluation Systems: Taking the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, and Singapore as Examples [J]. Journal of Hubei Administration Institute, 2011(04): 37-40
[7] Dai Huagui. The Enlightenment of Western Civil Servants' Professional Ethics Education on the Party Spirit Education of Chinese Party Member Leaders [J]. Forum for Party and Government Officials, 2014(10): 22-24
[8] Yu Lei. Report on the Inspection of Chinese Management Cadres' Training Course in Continuing Education in the United Kingdom [J]. Continuing Education, 1997(02): 43-46
[9] Zhang Xiaodong. Foreign Senior Civil Servants' Competency and Quality Model and Its Implications for the Continuing Education of Chinese Leading Officials: Taking the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Australia as Examples [J]. Lessons from Other Countries, 2016(08): 77-80
[10] Zhang Li. The Construction of the Training Security Mechanism for British Civil Servants and Its Implications for China [J]. Journal of Liaoning Administrative College, 2010(04): 83-85+89
[11] Luo Tongwen. The British Civil Servant Training System and Its Enlightenment [J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural Cadre Management College, 2011(01): 172-175
[12] Wang Jinbo. The Enlightenment of the British Education Inspection System on the Work of Cadre Education and Inspection in China [J]. Education and Training, 2015(03): 75-79
[13]Linda S ,Triluqman H B . Comparing Problem-based Learning and Experiential Learning on Civil Servant Training Program [J]. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 2019, 7 (2): 104-108.
[14]Ali S . The Development of Depok Civil Servant Training and Education System [J]. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2019, 6 (8): 54-69.
[15]Vyas . Customization in Civil Service Training: Implications for Outsourcing Human Resources Management [J]. International Journal of Public Administration, 2019, 42 (1): 41-54.
[16]Thakur R . Civil Service Training: The Changing Need [J]. The Indian Journal of Public Administration, 2015, 61 (4): 730-735.