Talking to Results: LLM-enabled Discussions of Quantitative Survey Findings

Sophia McDonnell¹, Aaron Heinz¹, Georg Wittenburg², Anja Langness³, Nicole Kleeb³

1: Verian, Germany; 2: Inspirient; 3: Bertelsmann Stiftung

Testing the Performance and Bias of Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic Survey Data

Charlotte Mueller, Bella Struminskaya, Peter Lugtig

Utrecht University, Netherlands, The

Transcribing and coding voice answers obtained in web surveys: comparing three leading automatic speech recognition tools

Melanie Revilla¹, Carlos Ochoa¹, Jan Höhne², Mick Couper³

1: RECSM-UPF, Spain; 2: DZHW, Leibniz University Hannover; 3: University of Michigan

Why Are People Unwilling to Participate in Smartphone App Data Collection? Results from Qualitative In-Depth Interviews

Alexander Wenz

University of Mannheim, Germany

Ready, set, go! Data collection for the household budget survey with an app

Maaike Kompier, Janelle van den Heuvel, Jelmer de Groot

Statistics Netherlands, Netherlands, The

The effect of control over data collection on willingness to participate in app-based data collection

Thijs Carriere, Bella Struminskaya, Laura Boeschoten

Utrecht University, Department of Methodology and Statistics

I misbehave, but only once in a while: how face-saving strategies can reduce socially desirable responding in online survey research

Emma Zaal, Yfke Ongena, John Hoeks

University of Groningen, Netherlands, The

‘And Yet…’: The Effectiveness of Probing Questions in Reducing Item Nonresponse to Financial Questions

Evgeniia Shmeleva, Daniil Lebedev, Ekaterina Bragina

NRU HSE, Russian Federation

Having ACES Up Your Sleeve: Developing and Validating Attention Checks Embedded Subtly (ACES) to Improve Identification of Inattentive Participants

Marek Muszyński

Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Assessing Trends in Turnout Bias in Social Science Surveys: Evidence from the European Social Survey and German Survey Programs

Saskia Bartholomäus^1,2, Elias Naumann¹, Tobias Gummer^1,2

1: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: University of Mannheim

Validating a 6-Item Scale for Measuring Perceived Response Burden in Establishment Surveys

André Pirralha¹, Joe Sakshaug²

1: IAB, Germany; 2: IAB, Germany; University of Munich, Germany

The effects of panel conditioning on response behavior across different cohorts: Bias in the Core Discussion Network

Santiago Andrés Alvarez Tobar

University of Mannheim, Germany

AI-Conducted User Research: From Weeks to Hours Through Autonomous Interviewing

Bruno Recht, Ernst Maximilian Münker

Userflix, Germany

Augmenting Qualitative Research with AI: Topic Modeling with Agentic RAG

Gerion Spielberger¹, Florian Artinger², Jochen Reb³, Rudolf Kerschreiter¹

1: Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; 2: Deutsche Hochschule, Germany; 3: Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore

Reinventing Online Qualitative Methods: Lessons from an AI-Assisted Study on Pathways Out of Loneliness

Anna Schneider¹, Ole Westhoff¹, Orkan Dolay²

1: Hochschule Trier, Germany; 2: Bilendi&respondi

Providing extra incentives for open voice answers in web surveys

Jan Karem Höhne¹, Melanie Revilla², Mick P. Couper³, Joshua Claassen¹

1: DZHW; Leibniz University Hannover, Germany; 2: RECSM-University Pompeu Fabra, Spain; 3: University of Michigan, USA

Alexa, Start the Interview! Respondents’ Experience with Smart Speaker Interviews Compared to Web Surveys

Anke Metzler¹, Ceyda Çavuşoğlu Deveci², Marek Fuchs¹

1: Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany; 2: Former Postdoc at Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany

Do respondents show higher activity and engagement in app-based diaries compared to web-based diaries? A case study using Statistics Netherlands’ Household Budget Diary.

Danielle Remmerswaal¹, Bella Struminskaya¹, Barry Schouten²

1: Utrecht University, The Netherlands; 2: Statistics Netherlands

Enhancing data accuracy in KnowledgePanel Europe: Leveraging different weighting techniques and adjustment variables for optimal outcomes

Femke De Keulenaer, Cristina Tudose

Ipsos

Do sampling and stratification strategies matter for treatment effects of political and media experiments administered online?

Klara Jagers, Tilda Ekström, Sebastian Lundmark

The SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Exploring the representativeness of web-only surveys of the general population

Pablo Cabrera Álvarez¹, Annette Jäckle¹, Jamie C Moore¹, Gabriele Durrant², Jonathan Burton¹, Peter W F Smith²

1: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex; 2: Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton

How Recruitment Channels Shape Data Quality: Evidence From A Multi-Source Panel

Fabienne Kraemer, Jessica Daikeler, Barbara Felderer, Barbara Binder

GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Looks great, responds poorly: lessons from ten years of invitation letter experiments

Jelmer de Groot, Ryanne Francot

Statistics Netherlands, The Netherlands

Using Text Messages (SMS) for Representative Sample Recruitment in Online Research

Ioannis Andreadis

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece