Show me, how you touch it – The effects of vicarious touch in online marketing videos

Sebastian Ziaja, Christian Bosau

Rheinische Hochschule Köln gGmbH, Germany

Data-Driven Decision-Making in Real Estate with TenantCM: Unlocking Value from Tenant Satisfaction Surveys

Matthias David Keller, Inna Becher, Verena Mack, Marc Herter, Justus Rathmann, Nicole Hänzi

YouGov Schweiz AG

Video-interviewing as part of a multi-mode design in panel studies: insights from the field

Julia Witton¹, Carina Cornesse², Markus Grabka¹, Sabine Zinn^1,3

1: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin); 2: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften; 3: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Willingness to Participate in Surveys Administered by Smart Speakers

Ceyda Deveci, Marek Fuchs, Anke Metzler

Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany

Data Quality Investigations of Online Live Video Interviewing: Empirical Evidence from Several Major UK Social Surveys

Gabriele Durrant¹, Sebastian Kocar², Tim Hanson³, Matt Brown³, Carole Sanchez³, Martin Wood⁴, Kate Taylor⁴, Maria Tsantani⁴, Tom Huskinson⁵

1: University of Southampton, United Kingdom; 2: University of Queensland; 3: UCL, University College London; 4: NatCen; 5: Ipsos

Horoscoping and Sampling: Preregistered Exploration of the Impact of Birth Month on Research Outcomes via the ‘Whose Birthday Is Next’ Sampling Strategy

Lydia Repke¹, Joris Mulder², Daniel Oberski³

1: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: Tilburg University, Netherlands; 3: Utrecht University, Netherlands

Sampling Refugees in Countries of First Refuge – An International Snowball Sampling Approach with Multiple Target Populations

Marvin Bürmann, Armin Küchler

Bielefeld University, Germany

Social Media Sampling for Quantitative Surveys in Hard-to-Reach Countries

Orkan Dolay, Clemens Rathe

Bilendi & respondi, France

A Simple Invitation: A Study on the Impact of Simplified Invitation Letters on the Willingness to Join a Probability-Based Web Panel in Sweden

Alexandra Garcia Nilsson, Felix Cassel, Björn Rönnerstrand

The SOM Institute, Sweden

Picture this! The influence of stressing the camera feature in the mail invitation to an app-based household budget survey on participation behavior

Florian Keusch¹, Maren Fritz¹, Johannes Volk², Lasse Häufglöckner²

1: University of Mannheim, Germany; 2: Destatis - Federal Statistical Office Germany, Germany

Ask Me Now or Lose Me Later – The Impact of Immediate Follow-Up on Participation Rates, Retention and Data Quality in Web Panels.

Tilda Ekström, Alexandra Garcia Nilsson, Anders Carlander

University of Gothenburg, Sweden

Designing passwords for web survey access: The effect of password length and complexity on survey and panel recruitment

Georg-Christoph Haas, Marieke Volkert, Stefan Zins

Institute for Employment Research, Germany

Using panelists self-stated motivations to craft efficient targeted email invitations to an online probability panel

Georg-Christoph Haas¹, Benjamin Baisch¹, Mark Trappmann^1,2, Jonas Weik¹

1: Institute for Employment Research, Germany; 2: University of Bamberg

Backing up a Panel with Piggybacking – The Effect of Piggybacking Recruitment on Nonresponse Bias and Panel Attrition in a Mixed Mode Panel Survey

Björn Rohr

GESIS - Leibnitz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Encouraging revision of ‘Don’t know’ responses: Comparing delayed and dynamic feedback in Web surveys

Anke Metzler, Stella Czak, Hannah Schwärzel, Marek Fuchs

Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany

Zooming in: Measuring Respondent´s Reactance and Receptivity to assess the effects of Error-Reducing Strategies in Web Surveys

Stella Czak, Hannah Schwärzel, Anke Metzler, Marek Fuchs

Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany

Understanding item-nonresponse in open questions with requests for voice responses

Camilla Salvatore¹, Jan Karem Höhne^2,3

1: Utrecht University, Netherlands, The; 2: German Center for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW); 3: Leibniz University Hannover

Do machine learning techniques improve nonresponse weighting?

Barbara Felderer, Björn Rohr, Christian Bruch

GESIS, Germany

Company Nonresponse in Gender Inequality Surveys: Challenges in Participation and Implications for Data Quality

Elena Ferrari¹, Margherita Pellegrino², Vera Lomazzi², Flavia Pesce¹

1: ARS - Associazione per la ricerca sociale; 2: University of Bergamo

Reasons for participating in (non)probability online panels and how to ask about it

Tanja Kunz, Irina Bauer

GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

A deeper look into education bias in web surveys

Mustafa Coban¹, Christine Distler², Mark Trappmann³

1: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Germany; 2: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Germany; 3: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Germany

CAPI, or not CAPI – That Is the Question: Using Administratative Data to Assign the Optimal Mode for Maximizing Response-Rates in a Household Panel

Patrick Lazarevic, Marc Plate

Statistik Austria, Austria

The Framework of Survey Behaviour: An Extension of the Framework for Web Survey Participation

Jeldrik Bakker, Jonas Klingwort, Vera Toepoel

Statistics Netherlands

Survey design features that matter: A meta-analysis using official statistics surveys of the Netherlands

Jeldrik Bakker, Jonas Klingwort, Vera Toepoel

Statistics Netherlands