
Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Session Overview |
Date: Wednesday, 20/Sept/2023 | ||
9:00am - 10:00am |
Begin Check-in |
|
10:00am - 1:00pm |
Workshop 1 Targeted Advertising for Survey Recruitment: Leveraging Social Media Platforms to Reach and Engage Survey Participants Bielefeld University, Germany |
Workshop 2 |
1:00pm - 1:30pm |
Break |
|
1:30pm - 4:30pm |
Workshop 3 Be careful of the careless: Data quality assessment for online surveys GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany |
Workshop 4 Trustworthy Analytics with Generative AI: ChatGPT/GPT-4 Hands-on Inspirient GmbH, Germany |
4:30pm - 5:00pm |
Break |
|
5:00pm - 7:00pm |
DGOF Members General Meeting |
|
7:00pm - 8:00pm |
Early Career Science Speed Dating |
|
8:00pm - 11:00pm |
GOR 23 Get Together |
Date: Thursday, 21/Sept/2023 | |||||
8:00am - 9:00am |
Begin Check-in |
||||
9:00am - 10:15am |
GOR 23 Opening & Keynote I The Evolution of Marketing Research: From Insights 1.0 to 5.0 LINK Marketing Services AG, Switzerland |
||||
10:15am - 10:45am |
Break |
||||
10:45am | Track A: Track A: Survey Research: Advancements in Online and Mobile Web Surveys sponsored by GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften |
Track B: Track B: Data Science: From Big Data to Smart Data |
Track C: Track C: Politics, Public Opinion, and Communication sponsored by aproxima |
Track D: Track D: Digital Methods in Applied Research |
Track T: Track T: GOR Thesis Award 2023 sponsored by TIVIAN |
10:45am - 11:45am |
A1: Survey Measurement I Open-Ended Survey Questions: A comparison of information content in text and audio response formats MZES, Universität Mannheim, Germany Attention please! Comparing different ways of presenting an instruction manipulation check in a probability-based online panel 1: DZHW; University of Hannover; 2: University of Mannheim; 3: Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals Measurement quality of a multi-item scale in plain language 1: GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: University of Mannheim |
B1: Text as Data Generative large language models for aspect-based sentiment analysis Q Agentur für Forschung GmbH, Germany Stereotypes in Social Media Data: Regionalization with Word Embedding Models Bielefeld University, Germany Statistical Analysis of Web Browsing Data: A Guide 1: GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Cologne; 2: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona; 3: Princeton University; 4: UC Davis; 5: American University, D.C. |
C1: Media Consumption Habits An experimental study of online information seeking on policy judgments 1: Konstanz University, Germany; 2: GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences; 3: Aalto University, Finland; 4: Université Paris Nanterre Media consumption patterns during the Russian-Ukrainian War: The role of proximity, media trust, and interest in politics in Germany and Israel 1: Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel; 2: LMU Munich The Privacy Paradox in WhatsApp: Examining the Relationships Between Usage, Concerns, and Protection Behaviors Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel |
D1: GOR Best Practice Award 2023 Competition 1 The Shortlist will be announced around the beginning of June. |
T1: GOR Thesis Award 2023 Competition 1 The Shortlist will be announced soon.. |
11:45am - 12:00pm |
Break |
||||
12:00pm - 1:00pm |
A2: Respondent Behavior and Data Quality Attitudes Over Time – Does Repeated Interviewing Trigger Reflection Processes in Respondents? 1: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences; 2: Utrecht University; 3: Trier University Survey professionalism: New evidence from trace data 1: GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Cologne; 2: New York University; 3: UC Davis; 4: American University, D.C. The Impact of Respondent Experience on Research Quality: Understanding the Importance of Quality Survey Design and Panel ecosystems Ipsos |
B2: ML and AI in Surveys Automated Split Questionnaire Design: The Way Forward in Survey Research? 1: Universität Wien, Austria; 2: Colorado State University Standardized Annotations for Survey Datasets: Enabling Automated Quality Assurance and Evaluation 1: Kantar Public, Germany; 2: Inspirient GmbH, Germany Using AI to enhance Qualitative Bonsai GmbH, Germany |
C2: Political Trust and Participation Spark the fire: the effect of changes in trust and well-being on political participation amid the COVID-19 pandemic Eurofound, Ireland Choice Architecture for Messaging Corruption: Evidence from an Adaptive Experiment 1: University College London, United Kingdom; 2: University of Oxford Online vs. Offline political engagement in irregular election campaigns: the role of political trust and desire for change in shaping engagement patterns. Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel |
D2: GOR Best Practice Award 2023 Competition 2 The Shortlist will be announced around the beginning of June. |
T2: GOR Thesis Award 2023 Competition 2 The Shortlist will be announced soon.. |
1:00pm - 2:15pm |
Lunch Break |
||||
2:15pm - 3:30pm |
P 1.1: Postersession |
P 1.2: Postersession |
P 1.3: Postersession |
P 1.4: Postersession |
P 1.5: Postersession |
3:30pm - 3:45pm |
Break |
||||
3:45pm - 4:45pm |
A3.1: Recruitment Processes for Online Surveys The Impact of Ad Images on Survey Recruitment and Sample Composition in Facebook Surveys 1: Bielefeld University, Germany; 2: Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research Attrition and type of panel recruitment: Comparing panel attrition between a probability and non-probability recruited sample of Swedish citizens University of Gothenburg, Sweden Comparing Social Media Samples in Africa against the Demographic Health Survey 1: Gesis Leibniz Institute for Soical Sciences, Germany; 2: Bernhardt Nocht Instutut for Tropical Medicine |
A3.2: Mixed Mode and Mode Transition Improving Response Rates and Sample Representativeness via a multimode design 1: SSRS, United States of America; 2: SSRS, United States of America; 3: Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States of America; 4: New Jersey Department of Human Services, United States of America; 5: New Jersey Department of Human Services, United States of America; 6: Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, United States of America Does Including Internet Users in the Mail Mode Improve the Data Quality of a Probability-Based Mixed-Mode Panel? 1: BKA, Wiesbaden, Germany; 2: GESIS, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany The public opinion survey of the city of Stuttgart. Methodological developments and their implementation City of Stuttgart, Germany |
B3: Smartphones, Sensors, and Geodata How long can we ask respondents to participate in an app-based travel diary study? 1: Utrecht University, Netherlands, The; 2: Statistics Netherlands Maintain the forest - Guidance of visitors by smartphone-based position data infas 360 GmbH, Germany Linking real estate online data with official statistics to analyze differences in rent price University of Bonn, Germany |
C3: Extremism and Hate Speech Sentiment and hate speech on social media. An analysis of the relevance of gender, age and migration background for the emergence of new communication structures within the YouTube Community University of Potsdam, Germany Did COVID-19 increase radicalization potential among misogynist extremists? 1: Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Czech Republic; 2: Freie Universität Berlin |
|
4:45pm - 5:00pm |
Break |
||||
5:00pm - 6:00pm |
A4.1: Data Quality in Online Surveys Data Quality Indicators: Some Practical Recommendation GESIS, Germany Fielding a long online survey: Evidence from the first Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) in the UK University of Southampton, United Kingdom Ability to identify fakers in online surveys: Comparison of BIDR.Short.24 and MCSD-SF University of Iceland, Iceland |
A4.2: Survey Measurement II Collecting Retrospective Biographical Data: The Effect of Mode and Tool Choice GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany Data Collection in Official Statistics: Responsive, Smart and Mixed Federal Statistical Office, Germany |
B4: Combining Self-Reports with Digital Behavioral Data Predicting Student Well-being Using Learning Analytics Human Technology Interaction (HTI) Group, Department of Industrial Engineering & Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology Studying online pornography use with a combination of web tracking and survey data: results from a German online sample 1: Bilendi & respondi; 2: Uni Würzburg; 3: Gesis Measuring Facebook Use: The Accuracy of Self-Reported Data vs. Digital Trace Data 1: Utrecht University; 2: Mannheim University; 3: University of Manchester |
||
8:00pm - 11:00pm |
GOR 23 Party |
Date: Friday, 22/Sept/2023 | ||||
9:30am - 10:00am |
Begin Check-in |
|||
10:00am - 10:45am |
Keynote II Population Representative Surveys, Wearables, and Contextual Data University of Southern California, United States of America |
|||
10:45am - 11:15am |
GOR Award Ceremony The following awards will be presented: - GOR Best Practice Award 2023 - GOR Thesis Award 2023 - GOR Poster Award 2023 - DGOF Best Paper Award 2023 |
|||
11:15am - 11:45am |
Break |
|||
11:45am | Track A: Survey Research: Advancements in Online and Mobile Web Surveys sponsored by GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften |
Track B: Data Science: From Big Data to Smart Data |
Track C: Politics, Public Opinion, and Communication sponsored by aproxima |
Track D: Digital Methods in Applied Research |
11:45am - 12:30pm |
A5: Increasing Survey Participation Impact on prepaid and postpaid incentive effectiveness of survey mode and incentive type Deutsches Zentrum für Integrations- und Migrationsforschung (DeZIM), Germany Quid Pro Quota? The Effects of Incentives on Survey Participation 1: Universität Wien, Austria; 2: Colorado State University |
B5: QR-Code Technology The effect of Quick Response (QR) codes on panel recruitment and survey response rates SOM-institutet, Sweden Promises and Perils of Using Quick Response Codes in Probability-Based Web Panel Surveys GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany |
C5: Political Issue Salience Does Local Weather affect Climate Change Salience? Evidence from Online Article Tracking Data in Germany 1: Süddeutsche Zeitung Digitale Medien, Germany; 2: Süddeutsche Zeitung, Germany Two years of Trending Topics: Measuring issue alignment in the German Twittersphere 1: Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften, Germany; 2: Laboratoire Lattice, CNRS & ENS-PSL & Université Sorbonne nouvelle, Paris, France; 3: Sciences Po, médialab, Paris, France; 4: Weizenbaum-Institut e.V., Germany |
|
12:30pm - 1:45pm |
Lunch Break |
|||
1:45pm - 2:45pm |
A6.1: Respondent Interaction How Eye Contact with a Robo-Advisor shapes Investment Decisions Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions, Germany The Solidarity Game: Exploring the methodological challenges of real-time respondent interactions in web surveys 1: DZHW; University of Hannover; 2: University of Duisburg-Essen; 3: University of Oldenburg The Dice Survey: how item order in a validated psychological stress instrument may affect the outcome SOM Institute, University of Gothenburg, Sweden |
A6.2: Bias Assessment and Correction The relationship between nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias. A network analysis Utrecht University, Netherlands, The In the practitioner's shoes: a comparison of post-stratification correction methods for web panel samples. 1: Department of Statistical Science, University of Padova, Italy; 2: Demetra Opinioni.net Assessing self-selection biases in online surveys: Evidence from the COVID-19 Health Behavior Survey Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany |
B6: Online Search Data What Do Racists Google? A Systematic Approach to Selecting and Validating Google Trends Data to Study Xenophobic Attitudes 1: University of Mannheim, Germany; 2: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES) Using regional Share of Search to boost brand growth TD Reply GmbH, Germany |
C6: Trust in Science Trust and Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe: Unveiling the Connection through Panel Data on COVID-19 EUROFOUND, Ireland Public trust in survey result reports: Does methodological information about the selection process and survey mode matter? GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany Beyond Likes: Engaging the Public with Medical Content on Social Media in Surgery Departments 1: Academic College of Emek Yezreel; 2: The University of Alabama at Birmingham; 3: Netanya Academic College |
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address: Privacy Statement · Conference: GOR 23 |
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.8.98 © 2001–2023 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany |