Nonresponse Bias Analysis

Barbara Felderer

GESIS, Germany

Smartphones: From Survey Design to Sensor Data

Vera Toepoel, Anne Elevelt

Statistics Netherlands, Netherlands, The

New Digital Possibilities in Qualitative Research

Susan Shaw

GIM Suisse AG, Switzerland

Establishing a new probability-based mixed-mode panel study in Germany: The Social Cohesion Panel

Carina Cornesse^1,2, Jean-Yves Gerlitz^2,3

1: DIW Berlin; 2: RISC Data Centre; 3: University of Bremen

Effects of different mode choice sequences in the recruitment of a probability-based mixed-mode panel in Germany: Insights from FReDA

Tobias Gummer, Pablo Christmann, Tanja Kunz, Anne-Sophie Oehrlein, Lisa Schmid

GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Incentive effects in probability-based two-part web surveys

Oliver Lipps^1,2, Michèle Ernst Stähli¹, Michael Ochsner^1,3, Alexandre Pollien¹

1: FORS; 2: University of Bern; 3: ETH Zurich

Harvesting the Web for Research using Template-based Retrieval

André Lang, Stephan Müller

Insius, Germany

Geocoding Tweets Using Profile Locations: Incomplex Idea, Intricate Implementation

H. Long Nguyen, Dorian Tsolak, Anna Karmann, Stefan Knauff, Simon Kühne

Bielefeld University, Germany

Bad Science: Retractions, Citations and Media Coverage

Eleonora Alabrese

University of Warwick, United Kingdom

Is Populism Contagious? Evidence from Parliamentary Speeches in Germany

Felix Hagemeister¹, Emilio Esguerra², Julian Heid², Tim Leffler²

1: TUM School of Social Sciences and Technology, Germany; 2: LMU Munich

Leverage the Virtual Consumer – How an online Augmented Intelligence solution supports Henkel sales teams to climb up the effectiveness ladder.

Dirk Held¹, Vera Wagner²

1: aimpower GmbH, Germany; 2: Henkel, Germany

The Four Horsemen of Advertising Success: Ride the Insights Wave with Mind Mining

Steffen Schmidt¹, Anna Benner², Dang Ngyuen², Alex Schmidlin¹, Jonathan T. Mall³, Mike Storm⁴, Frank Buckler⁵

1: LINK Marketing Services AG, Switzerland; 2: Credit Suisse AG, Switzerland; 3: neuroflash GmbH, Germany; 4: Neurons Inc., Denmark; 5: Success Drivers, Germany

The Swiss Energy Market Atlas: Shaping the Future of Energy Suppliers with a Smart Combination of Machine Learning and Market Research

Stefan Reiser¹, David Sanchez¹, Thomas Spycher²

1: LINK, Switzerland; 2: Novalytica, Switzerland

Wearable devices as a surrogate for time use surveys

Seyit Hocuk¹, Pradeep Kumar¹, Joris Mulder¹, Alberto Zezza², Talip Kilic²

1: Centerdata, Netherlands, The; 2: The World Bank, United Nations

Modernization of Data Collection Methods

Georg-Christoph Haas^1,2

1: Institute for Employment Research, Germany; 2: University of Mannheim

Web-Push Strategies for Probability-Based Mixed-Mode Panel Surveys

David Bretschi

Federal Criminal Police Office, Germany

Smart(phone) Surveys

Anne Elevelt^1,2

1: Statistics Netherlands, Netherlands, The; 2: Utrecht University

Automatic Conversion and Execution of LimeSurvey Surveys within Chats

Alexander Tobias Neumann, Theresa Täuber, Ralf Klamma

RWTH Aachen University, Germany

Speaking or typing? Comparing voice and text answers to open questions on sensitive topics in smartphone surveys

Jan Karem Höhne^1,2, Konstantin Gavras³

1: University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany; 2: RECSM-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain; 3: University of Mannheim, Germany

Speech in Research 2.0

Holger Lütters

HTW Berlin, Germany

How to Increase the Acceptance of Mobile App and Sensor Data Collection?

Alexander Wenz, Florian Keusch

University of Mannheim, Germany

Challenges of Measuring Social Interaction with Smartphone App Data

Sonja Malich¹, Georg-Christoph Haas^1,2, Florian Keusch², Sebastian Bähr¹, Frauke Kreuter^3,4, Mark Trappmann^1,5

1: Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Germany; 2: University of Mannheim, Germany; 3: University of Maryland, USA; 4: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Germany; 5: University of Bamberg, Germany

How active should respondents be in smart surveys with passive sensor data collection?

Anne Elevelt¹, Jeldrik Bakker¹, Barry Schouten^1,2, Jannick Akkermans², Evelien Rodenburg²

1: Statistics Netherlands, Netherlands, The; 2: Utrecht University

The effect of censorship in different regime types; When the global public good of the internet is perceived to have negative externalities

Rutger Hagen^1,2

1: Leiden University, Netherlands, The; 2: KU Leuven, Belgium

Under pressure: Spatial dynamics and party-level strategies in negative campaigning during the 2021 German election

Wiebke Drews, Jasmin Riedl, Johannes Steup

Universität der Bundeswehr München, Germany

HR RESEARCH COCKPIT 2.0

Jörg Hilber

Constant Dialog AG, Switzerland

Close, Closer, BILENDI DISCUSS - Opportunities and Limitations for DIY-Qual and Agency Use

Florian Engel¹, Andrea Wielpütz², Clara Scharpf³, Christoph Welter³

1: Bilendi & respondi, Germany; 2: congstar GmbH, Germany; 3: Point Blank, Germany

Eye Tracking and Qualitative Research Communities - Case Study and Practical Experiences

Ruth Wakenhut¹, Antje Venjakob²

1: Kernwert GmbH, Germany; 2: oculid GmbH, Germany

Motivational Methods to Reduce Possible Response Biases of Online Survey Participants in the Context of Market Research

Truong Trung Hieu Nguyen

University of Hohenheim, Germany

The Dirichlet Dual Response Model: An Item Response Model for Continuous Bounded Responses Collected via Dual Range Sliders

Matthias Kloft

Philipps-University Marburg, Germany

Follow me: Social media users and factors affecting agendas during Election

Yaron Ariel, Vered Elishar-Malka, Dana Weimann-Saks

Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel

Top of Mind: how to ask in online questionnaires

Beatrice Bartoli¹, Croce Serafina², Pamela Fachin²

1: Demetra Opinioni.net, Italy; 2: RAI Pubblicità S.p.A

Validating the Survey Attitude Scale (SAS): Are Measurements Comparable Among Different Samples of Highly Qualified from German Higher Education?

Isabelle Fiedler¹, Thorsten Euler¹, Niklas Jungermann², Ulrike Schwabe¹

1: German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW) Hannover; 2: University of Kassel

Nonresponse of refugees in web surveys

Florian Heinritz

Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories, Germany

Client-side researchers versus outside contractors: How do in-house market research professionals collaborate with external survey agencies?

Wojciech Jablonski

Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, Netherlands, The

Respondents’ Identification with a Panel Study: Does it Help to Improve Data Quality?

Niklas Jungermann¹, Schwabe Ulrike², Isabelle Fiedler², Euler Thorsten²

1: University of Kassel; 2: German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)

Piloting Experimental Tests of Macro-Micro-Level Effects in an Artificial Online State: Increasing the external validity of behavioural measures

Achim Goerres, Jakob Kemper

University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

Setting Up An Online Access Panel Of People Of Immigrant Origin In Germany

Almuth Lietz, Sabrina Mayer, Jörg Dollmann, Madeleine Siegel, Jonas Köhler

German Center for Integration and Migration Research, Germany

Development and validation of a generalized online self-disclosure scale

Robert Luzsa, Lisa Mitterhuber, Susanne Mayr

University Passau, Germany

The impact of monetary incentives on retention rates in a panel study with mixed web and mail modes

Lisa Marie Natter

Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Germany

Studying behind black tiles

Anna Riedel, Barbara Praetorius

HTW Berlin, Germany

Comparing estimates of probability and non-probability surveys against populations benchmarks from the German Mikrozensus

Björn Rohr, Barbara Felderer, Henning Silber

GESIS, Germany

Comparing “Check All That Apply” and “Forced Choice” Formats on Smartphones and Computers

Lukas Schick, Patricia Hadler, Cornelia Neuert

GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

Characteristics of the measurement and coding of qualitative data collected online

Daniela Wetzelhütter

University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Austria

Description and Implementation of an Experiment With Randomly Assembled User Groups Investigating the Effect of App Push Notification Frequency

Atilla Wohllebe¹, Florian Blaschke²

1: WR Institute of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany; 2: MATE Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences - Kaposvár Campus, Kaposvár, Hungary

Optimising Standardised Survey Questions for Measuring Political Solidarities and Related Concepts in Online Surveys

Achim Goerres, Jan Karem Höhne

University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

Capturing the interaction between question order effects and visual layout: results from an online experiment

Adam Stefkovics, Zoltan Kmetty

Harvard University, United States of America

Nonresponse-related quality indicators of Web Probing responses and bias in cross-cultural web surveys

Dörte Naber¹, José-Luis Padilla²

1: GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: University of Granada

Quantifying nonresponse and measurement uncertainty in surveys based on a replication of the European Social Survey

Blanka Szeitl¹, Tamás Rudas²

1: Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, and University of Szeged, Hungary; 2: Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary

Barriers to transitioning to online data collection in social survey: Findings from GenPopWeb2 project

Olga Maslovskaya

University of Southampton, United Kingdom

GPS-Tracking mit einer Smartphone App

Beat Fischer

intervista, Switzerland

Social Listening mit KI intelligent auswerten

Jörg Forthmann

IMWF Institut für Management- und Wirtschaftsforschung, Germany

Ethik im Umgang mit Daten und Modellen: Welche praktischen Herausforderungen bringen Data Science Projekte für MarktforscherInnen

Christoph Bräunlich

BSI Software, Switzerland

Width is the limit – Investigating the response behavior and data quality in a layout experiment within a panel survey

Maikel Schwerdtfeger¹, Sven Stadtmüller¹, Bella Struminskaya², Bernd Weiß¹

1: GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Germany; 2: Utrecht University

Noncompliance with attention checks in web surveys: Can we train false-positives to become compliant?

Joss Roßmann, Axel Burger, Tobias Gummer, Henning Silber

GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Differences in Online behaviour of men and women: large N network analysis

Linda Coufalová

Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Czech Republic

StakeX - Organizational Networks from Web Research

Swen Sieben, Paul Simmering

Q | Agentur für Forschung GmbH, Germany

Stimulus validity in political communication research

Bernhard Clemm von Hohenberg

University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, The

A Closer Look at Face-Saving Response Options to Reduce Vote Overreporting: Disentangling Social Desirability Bias, Memory Failure, and Response Order Effects

Rebekka Kluge¹, Fabienne Krämer¹, Henning Silber¹, Michael Bosnjak^2,3, Joanna Koßmann², Bella Struminskaya⁴, Bernd Weiß¹

1: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: Leibniz-Institute for Psychology (ZPID - Leibniz Institute); 3: University of Trier; 4: Utrecht University

Insights Beyond Human Intuition: Comprehensively Mining Survey Data

Martin Schniedermeier¹, Georg Wittenburg², Sophia Schmid¹

1: Kantar Public, Germany; 2: Inspirient, Germany

Today’s Dynamic Healthcare Environment Deserves Brave New Thinking - The Role and Profile of Pmr - How Is It Is Changing - Views from a Collection of Global Pharma Insight Clients Using an Online Swarm AI

Carolyn Chamberlain

Blueprint Partnership, United Kingdom

Do Response Effects Change Over Time? Experimental Results From Six Waves of a German Online Panel Survey

Fabienne Kraemer¹, Henning Silber¹, Bella Struminskaya², Michael Bosnjak^3,4, Joanna Koßmann³, Bernd Weiß¹

1: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany; 2: Utrecht University; 3: ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology; 4: University of Trier

Panel conditioning - Measuring the effect of previous survey participation on survey estimates

Curtis Jessop

NatCen, United Kingdom

For Whom Is It Worth It? Comparing Accelerometer and Survey Data For Sociodemographic Subgroups

Katharina Meitinger¹, Vera Toepoel¹, Ellen de Hollander², Wanda Wendel-Vos²

1: Utrecht University, Netherlands, The; 2: RIVM

Guess what I am doing: Identifying Physical Activities from Accelerometer data by Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Joris Mulder, Seyit Höcük, Pradeep Kumar

Centerdata - Tilburg University, The Netherlands

Using accelerometers in national monitoring of Physical Activity: a feasibility study

Vera Toepoel¹, Annemieke Luiten², Anne Elevelt², Inge de Wolf³

1: utrecht university; 2: CBS; 3: Amsterdam Public Health

Climate change and Corona: concerns, attitudes and behaviors of German households

René Bernard, Panagiota Tzamourani

Deutsche Bundesbank, Germany

The Psychometric Differences of Climate Change Activists and Deniers on Twitter

Mary Sanford

University of Oxford, United Kingdom

The Durability of Prejudice: The Role of Stereotypes in Human-AI Interaction

Jonathan Winter

European University Institute, Italy

Smart Data vs. Big Data: Relevanz repräsentativer Stichproben in der Reichweitenforschung

Kerstin Niederauer-Kopf

AGFVideoforschung GmbH, Germany

CAWI-Erhebungen als wichtiger Mixed-Mode-Baustein der agma-Reichweitenstudien

Jörg Sunnus

Media-Micro-Census GmbH, Germany

Gütekriterien für Datenqualität bei Online-Umfragen

Florian Kögl

Redem, Austria

Money over quality? Warum wir Gefahr laufen, die Fehler traditioneller Datenerhebung zu wiederholen und wie wir dies verhindern könnten

Otto Hellwig

Bilendi & respondi, Germany

The Role of Algorithms in Computational Social Science

Claudia Wagner^1,2

1: RWTH Aachen, Germany; 2: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Why does my questionnaire take so long?

Jeldrik Bakker, Barry Schouten, Anne Elevelt

Statistics Netherlands, Netherlands, The

Collecting Retrospective Data in Web Surveys: Alternatives to Event History Calendars

Irina Bauer

GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Web, Paper or Mix? Effects of Single- and Mixed-Mode Designs on Establishment Survey Participation and Costs

Benjamin Küfner¹, Jospeh W. Sakshaug^1,2,3, Stefan Zins¹

1: Institute for Employment Research, Germany; 2: Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich; 3: University Mannheim

Mixed or Single Web-Mode? Results of a Field Experiment in Early Education and Care Surveys in Germany

Diana D. Schacht

DJI e.V., Germany

From CAPI to Web-CATI in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: nonresponse in longitudinal samples after changing survey modes

Gianfranco Addario

NatCen Social Research, United Kingdom

From mixed mode to online. Learning from moving a cross-sectional postal survey of 16-year olds online

Dirk Schubotz, Martina McKnight, Katrina Lloyd, Paula Devine

Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom

Digital Inequalities and Public Health during COVID-19: Media Dependency and Vaccination

Grant Blank¹, Bianca C. Reisdorf²

1: University of Oxford, United Kingdom; 2: University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Spreading online rumors during a global pandemic: the role of knowledge, trust, and emotions

Dana Weimann Saks¹, Yaron Ariel¹, Vered Elishar Malka¹, Gabriel Weimann²

1: Yezreel Valley Collage, Israel; 2: Haifa University

Information dissemination of extremist on Facebook

‪Vlad Vasiliu‬‏¹, Gabriel Weimann², Yaron Ariel¹

1: Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel; 2: Haifa University

Blended calibration – How to create population-representative survey results for a reliable regionalisation

Franziska Kern¹, Julia Kroth¹, Reiner Gilberg²

1: infas 360 GmbH, Germany; 2: infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft

Combining probability and non-probability samples for analytic inference: a Bayesian approach

Camilla Salvatore¹, Silvia Biffignandi², ‪Joseph W. Sakshaug³, Arkadiusz Wisniowski⁴, Bella Struminskaya⁵

1: University of Milano Bicocca (Italy); 2: University of Bergamo (Italy); 3: German Institute for Employment Research (Germany); 4: University of Manchester (United Kingdom); 5: Utrecht University (Netherlands)

Effects of different response time outlier definitions in probability and nonprobability online panels

Patricia Hadler, Tanja Kunz

GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Polarizing Ads for Recruiting Survey Participants: A Comparative Study of Facebook Ads and Their Effects on Sample Composition

Zaza Zindel, Simon Kühne

Bielefeld University, Germany

The High frequency Online Personal Panel (HOPP): Reflecting on organizational processes in an online data collection

Marieke Volkert¹, Georg-Christoph Haas^1,2

1: Institute for Employment Research, Germany; 2: University of Mannheim, Germany

Strategic social media use in political campaigning: An individual level analysis linking candidate surveys with Facebook and Twitter communication

Philipp Darius¹, Sebastian Stier²

1: Hertie School, Berlin, Germany; 2: GESIS, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany

Maximizing the Audiences: Portuguese Parties' Facebook Presence in 2019

Daniel Cardoso^1,2, N. Gizem Bacaksizlar Turbic³, Jorge Martins Rosa², Marisa Torres da Silva²

1: Lusófona University; 2: ICNOVA, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa; 3: GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences

What matters for keeping and winning support in the course of a televised debate?

Thomas Waldvogel, Uwe Wagschal, Samuel Weishaupt

Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany

Analyzing voting behavior with different survey samples: Results from a large-scale comparison of a nonprobability and a probability survey in the GLES (German Longitudinal Election Study).

Hannah Bucher

GESIS, Germany

Stop Chasing the Tail! A new Framework for the Analysis of Representation Bias

Michael Ochsner

FORS, Switzerland

“Push-to-Web" survey, as a combination of face-to-face and online survey

Vera Messing², Bence Ságvári², Blanka Szeitl¹

1: Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, and University of Szeged, Hungary; 2: Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence

Concurrent Design vs. Push-to-Web: Survey Participation in a Mixed Mode General Social Survey

Alexandra Asimov, Michael Blohm

GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany

Stop spreading discontent: the effects of social media on discontent towards government intervention during COVID-19 in Europe

Michele Consolini, Massimiliano Mascherini

Eurofound, Ireland

Pandemic Social Media Hate Speech Analysis

Holger Lütters¹, Andre Lang²

1: HTW Berlin,; 2: Insius, Germany

Handling life under fire in a multi-media environment: Israeli civilians use of Second Screens during Operation "Guardian of the Walls.”

Vered Elishar Malka, Dana Weimann-Saks, Yaron Ariel

The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Israel