Session | |
114 (I): Towards more resilient food systems: exploring spaces between the mainstream and alternatives (I)
Additional Session Chairs: Marta Kolářová, Jan Vávra, Petr Jehlička
| |
Session Abstract | |
The ongoing complex crises have thrown into stark relief the vulnerability and unsustainability of the current food systems. At the same time, they have brought popular and academic attention to food as an arena for experimenting with and contesting novel ways of food provisioning. An important but often neglected opportunity for enhanced resilience of the food systems rests in the combination of the dominant capitalist food system with is diverse alternatives. While research on alternative food networks, food self-provisioning, sharing, foraging and other non-market or community-based alternatives mushroomed in recent decades, it developed in almost complete isolation from research on the conventional system. In contrast to this epistemic separation, many households combine food from conventional and alternative sources in their daily routines. This Session aims to explore links and interdependencies between the food systems, the hybrid spaces “in between”, and the ways the systems mutually interact and influence each other. Our objective is to look at these links, spaces and interactions from the perspective of resilience while stressing the practicalities of household’s everyday practices. Welcomed are contributions about food self-provisioning, alternative food networks and other alternatives which take into account the place of the dominant food system in shaping practices, motivations and values attached to produced, shared or consumed food. We also invite critical research on the conventional food system’s sensitivities to actual or potential influences of food alternatives. Both conceptual and empirical contributions are welcome, as are papers using various theoretical lenses and located in diverse social and geographical contexts. The contributions may aim at the following themes, but are not limited to them: -Theories of hybridity in the context of food and food systems. -Theorising value of food. -Decolonising interpretations of food alternatives (in academic and political discourse). -Perception of quality, price and access to food from conventional supply chains as a factor influencing the scale of food alternatives. -Enacting, contesting and transgressing borders between mainstream and alternatives. -Examples of conflicts, cooperation or co-optation between mainstream and alternative food systems. | |
Presentations | |
Community-supported agriculture through the lens of values-based modes of production and consumption 1Institute of Development Research, BOKU University, Austria; 2Department of Geography, University of Innsbruck; 3Department of Sociology, University of Innsbruck Our current food regime is inherently unstable and susceptible to crises. Different food initiatives like community-supported agriculture (CSA) have been addressing these crises, mostly in Northern America and Western Europe, for over 50 years. CSA initiatives in these regions have been largely examined within the alternative food network literature, e.g., focusing on their modus operandi or members’ motivations. We have analyzed CSA in three different countries—Switzerland, Czechia and Argentina. While certain mechanisms and motivations are similar, our analysis highlights the importance of context-specific factors in shaping the transformative potential of these alternatives, and the unique challenges they encounter within the current food regime. Drawing on the interdisciplinary theoretical framework of values-based modes of production and consumption, we put our three cases into dialogue and show that (historical) political contexts (authoritarian political regime, (post) socialism, (direct) democracy) and different positions within uneven development influence the current agricultural structure of each respective country and thus the role of CSA within it. Whereas Argentina and Czechia are characterized by export-driven agroholdings with transnational retail chains profoundly shaping domestic consumption in the case of the latter, Switzerland's agri-food system is strongly finance-led but family-farm orientated. Unlike Czechia, Argentina has not fully adopted the Western model of CSA, among other reasons, due to inhibiting high inflation rates. In Czechia, (peri-)urban areas are centers of CSA and women on maternity leave often represent crucial actors since they value healthy food for their children. There is however, similar to the Argentinian case, a lack of solidarity with farmers on the side of consumers in times of economic hardship, and insufficient institutional support of these bottom-up initiatives. The researched Swiss CSA links urban consumers with rural mountain farmers. The spatial distance and members’ required work stays encompassing the physically demanding and time-intensive task of herding goats pose challenges to the participating members and farmers. Membership in this CSA demands a high level of commitment that diverts from the convenience of the dominant food system, limiting the accessibility of this alternative food initiative. Overall, CSAs in all countries struggle reaching larger groups of the population. Unravelling middle-class perspectives on mainstream and alternative food system among shopping community members in Hungary 1HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary,; 2Budapest Metropolitan University, Hungary Using qualitative sociological methods, this paper investigates the place and role of alternative food systems and sustainable food consumption as they appear in the everyday food consumption of middle-class, shopping community member consumers in Hungary. The paper is part of a larger nationwide project exploring sustainable food and energy consumption patterns in the context of social inequalities, analysing the meanings of sustainability, and food and energy consumption practices for different social groups. Shopping communities are typically made up of middle-class consumers. Women and families with small children are at the centre of these communities. The central question is: How does the shopping community change the everyday patterns of food consumption of its members? What amounts of food that are being purchased regularly through the shopping community? What limitations and obstacles have been identified by the members? How is the mainstream food system perceived and represented by the members of the shopping community? How do the community and the activities of the community influence the attitudes, perceptions and behaviour of its members towards sustainable consumption and alternative food system in opposition to mainstream food system? Shopping communities have mushroomed in Hungary in recent years, mobilising different types of communities and services, typically focusing on issues such as health, quality food, sustainability, local awareness, community values and self-help. In spite of this, the share of the alternative food system in the Hungarian food consumption is still very small and limited. This paper is based on participant observation and over 50 semi-structured interviews with members and organisers of shopping communities across Hungary. We analyse four different types of shopping communities, ranging from online markets to community-supported agriculture (CSA), and from well-organised small-town communities to loose, extended networks in Budapest. The study sheds light on the diverse attitudes and perspectives of middle-class consumers towards alternative food systems and sustainable food consumption. The first results of the analysis show that the main value of the shopping community as an alternative food system is related to health and quality food. However, most consumers also use the mainstream food system in their daily food consumption practices. Only the members of a small, strong community are more focused on sustainable food choices, awareness and behaviour, and tend to use the alternative food system in their everyday food consuming practices. Resources and Relations: Everyday modes of food sharing in rural South Bohemia University of Bergen, Norway Framed within debates about moral/affective economies, and based on longitudinal ethnographic research, this paper explores intergenerational exchanges of food and foodstuffs within families in rural South Bohemia. Through a detailed examination of the kinds of foodstuffs that are exchanged, the paper demonstrates how various intra-familial modes of food sharing smoothly combine market-based products with home grown food and include a range of substances; from raw meat via readymade dishes to food waste. Food is given and received as part of everyday, non-conspicuous interactions between kin (mainly women), bordering on other often “invisible” everyday activities such as childcare. The “easiness” of the exchanges, and the strong lines of affect and obligation that underlie this circulation, indicate a local food system that is both flexible and resilient. In a longitudinal perspective, we find that it has been subject to substantial change, though. This includes changes in the food self-provisioning carried out by families - thus the mix between “home grown/bred” and market- based food stuff - and in gendered responsibilities and labour related to food work. The paper discusses some of these changes and their possible implications for the local food system as such. Food Self-Provisioning: To Transform of Existing Lifestyles with Vitality and Creativity Chinese National Academy of Arts, China, People's Republic of Food self-provisioning (FSP) is one of the most important legacies of agricultural civilizations. In today’s world of uncertainties, the practice of FSP enhances resilience and promotes sustainable growth. FSP also has the function of creating and altering spaces in both tangible and intangible ways. With the needs for green living, it not only promotes balanced development and a symbiotic relationship between human and nature, but also to transform of existing lifestyles with vitality and creativity. |