PO3: 7
Review of the mass absorption cross-section literature for mixed atmospheric black carbon
Eija Asmi1, Joel Corbin2, John Backman1, Konstantina Vasilatou3, Ernest Weingartner4, Krzysztof Ciupek5, Thomas Müller6, Arun Babu Suja6, Griša Močnik7,8,9, Luka Drinovec7,8, Kostas Eleftheriadis10, Jorge Saturno11
1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland; 2Metrology Research Centre, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada; 3Laboratory Particles and Aerosols, Federal Institute of Metrology METAS, Bern, 3003, Switzerland; 4University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, CH-5210 Windisch, Switzerland; 5Air Quality and Aerosol Metrology Group, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK; 6Atmospheric Microphysics Department, Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; 7Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, 5270, Slovenia; 8Haze Instruments d.o.o., Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia; 9Department of Environmental Sciences, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia; 10Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation, NCSR Demokritos, Paraskevi, Attiki, 15310, Greece; 11Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
We compile more than 200 MACBC values from 63 studies and explore the effects of sampling location, study duration, instrumentation (photometers, photoacoustic; mass concentration (CBC) from thermal-optical analysis, or SP2), measurement wavelength, thermal–optical protocol. The data show that photoacoustic measurements of MACBC were consistently higher in remote relative to urban environments, indicating Eabs>1 in remote environments, as expected. This trend was not evident for filter-based measurements, and few other clear trends could be identified in general. Notably, wavelength-dependent trends were not evident. Our results do not support the use of simplistic generalizations or assumptions about MACBC in the atmosphere.