Conference Agenda
| Session | ||||
WG4: Air pollutant exposure and mapping (I)
| ||||
| Presentations | ||||
10:15am - 10:30am
TU1-3: 1 Bucharest fine-scale mapping and aerosol composition trends using RADO-Bucharest site measurements 1National Institute of Research and Development for Optoelectronics INOE2000, Romania; 2UNST Politehnica of Bucharest, Bulevardul Iuliu Maniu 1-3, Bucharest, 061071, Bucharest, Romania; 3Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Bucuresti, Romania Romania's Bucharest faces air pollution issues. RADO-Bucharest, a three-component ACTRIS national facility, provides the opportunity to assess the levels and properties of contaminants within a region using high-time resolution data. The 10-year analysis of carbonaceous aerosols mass concentration daily variability at site points to biomass burning as a source of increased concentrations during the cold season. Mobile monitoring campaigns were performed during the warm and cold periods to capture air pollution variability in Bucharest. The retrieved air pollution maps show the contribution of diverse areas to air pollution, gradients in particle concentrations between areas, and individual exposure along roads.
10:30am - 10:45am
TU1-3: 2 Exposure assessment to traffic related atmospheric pollution - case study of street fruits dealers in the city of Thiès, Senegal Alioune Diop University, Senegal African nations have part of the economy informal with street dealers selling goods while being exposed to pollution from vehicles. A survey was conducted to assess their level of awareness and exposure to particulate matter in the city of Thiès, Senegal. A Particle Plus 8301-AQM2 Series measured particles concentrations. More than 40% of participants declared to be often affected by cough, headaches, cold and sore throat. Measured PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations were in the range of 25-75 and, 250-700 µg/m3, respectively. Therefore, it is recommended that measures being taken to inform and help street dealers monitor their health and safety.
10:45am - 11:00am
TU1-3: 3 Drosophila melanogaster as a bioindicator of PM-induced oxidative stress effects 1Department of Environmental Biology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; 2Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome; 3Department of Medicine, epidemiology and environmental and occupational hygiene (INAIL); 4C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research; 5Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome In this paper, the use of the model organism D. melanogaster is proposed to study PM-induced adverse effects. Individuals of D. melanogaster were exposed under laboratory conditions to increasing concnetrations of brake dust and in situ in an art ceramic factory at 4 selected sites each representative of a different work process. For both exposures analyses included element bioaccumulation, antioxidant enzymes, NMR metabolomics, and oxidative stress were performed. Results showed metabolic alterations and oxidative stress, varying by exposure. D. melanogaster bioaccumulation correlated with PM10 composition. This highlights D. melanogaster's potential as a PM toxicity assessment tool.
11:00am - 11:15am
TU1-3: 4 Understanding pesticides monitoring with local agricultural uses and practices 1Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France; 2Air-Breizh, 3 E Rue de Paris, 35510 Cesson-Sévigné, France; 3LB Environnement, 35000 Rennes, France A case study in Mordelles (France) examined the relationship between airborne pesticides and agricultural activities using a monitoring station. Data on pesticides use came from a national sales database, while farming practices were gathered from a local survey and meteorological data from official records. Herbicides, especially prosulfocarb and pendimethalin, showed seasonal peaks, linking application periods to air concentrations. The detection of banned lindane highlights its persistence. Triallate, though not sold or applied locally, was also present, demonstrating pesticide mobility. Additionally, the survey identified 54 unmonitored substances, revealing the need for adaptations in national surveillance lists to better reflect regional practices.
| ||||