Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

 
 
Session Overview
Session
Gendered Labour (traditional panel)
Time:
Thursday, 31/Oct/2024:
1:30pm - 3:00pm

Session Chair: Sofia P. Caldeira
Location: The Octagon: Meeting Room 4


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Breadwinner or breadmaker: Contradictions in tradwives' creator labor, religious vernacular, and aesthetics

Roxana Mika Muenster, Margaret E. Foster

Cornell University

First emerging around 2015, tradwives represent a nostalgic yearning for a mythic past and white supremacist utopia. Yet, in recent years, tradwife creators have received increased mainstream attention and notoriety for their display of “traditional” gender roles, 1950s aesthetics, and open anti-feminism. This online prominence has led some of them, paradoxically, to emerge as the breadwinner in their family–a development that seems at odds with their professed belief that women should eschew careers in favor of childrearing and homemaking. In this in-progress, mixed-methods project, we aim to understand the tensions between the traditional gender roles tradwives advocate for and the entrepreneurial nature of their online promotion and monetization of said lifestyle. We conducted a computational text analysis of 25 English-language creators’ websites, as well as a qualitative analysis of the creators’ Instagram Story highlights. Our emerging findings show that tradwives’ solution to the tension between their professed ideology and their entrepreneurial activities lies in the obfuscation thereof: Neither housework nor creator labor are discussed as work. Explicit political discussions remain similarly unspoken, except for occasional expressions of opposition to feminism and reproductive rights. Religion, however, features prominently. The obfuscation of labor and absence of explicit politics represents a strategic move towards palatability that allows the current iteration of the tradwife to find greater mainstream appeal than earlier tradwives. Our results suggest that the tradwife is a particular influencer style or vernacular around a coherent ideological theme, thus emerging as a metapolitical branding strategy.



Ambivalent Affective Labour, Datafication of Qing and Danmei Writers in the Cultural Industry

Liang Ge

King's College London, United Kingdom

Danmei 耽美 culture, which features male-male romance and/or erotica, emerged in mainland China in the late 1990s and has been flourishing since the 2010s across East and Southeast Asia. The dynamic Chinese danmei culture has received significant attention in academia in recent years, either by mapping out the resistant potential against the heteronormativity or by highlighting the escapist route for expressing the women participants’ desires. The danmei culture has evolved into a transmedia landscape, and at the same time, an ever-expanding cultural industry being exploited by the logic of capital. Danmei writers as affective labors living in such a cultural industry have been rarely considered in present danmei studies.

Through exploring the datafication of qing (情, affects and desires) via in-depth interviews with contracted danmei writers on Jinjiang, I examine the distinct feature of danmei writers as ambivalent affective labor. For danmei writers, the datafication and monetization of qing leads to increasingly formulaic writing. By selecting, appropriating and combing the elements in the database of qing, danmei writers are able to swiftly generate a male homoerotic love story that efficiently and effectively invoke the affects and desires of readers for better monetization. Pleasures and pains are both involved in doing the ambivalent affective labor, which further consolidates the precariousness of the affective labour. However, the affects and desires per se cannot be fully manipulated – transformative momentum is embedded in the water-like qing all the time.



ERROR 404: SEX WORKER DIGITAL TACTICS RESISTING ENFORCED INVISIBILITY

Nicole Veronica Bush1, Christianna Clark2

1Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, United States of America; 2Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Pepperdine University, United States of America

On April 6, 2018, visitors to the classified advertising website Backpage were informed that U.S. law enforcement had seized backpage.com and its affiliated websites. Five days later, Donald Trump signed the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (SESTA) and the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act (FOSTA) (Romano, 2018). For sex workers, this marked the tragic end of an era of increased safety, where social media was used to mitigate potential risks of in-person sex work.

This co-authored autoethnographic study builds upon Are's (2021) research on Meta's "shadowbanning" practices on Instagram. According to Cottom (2020), social media platforms are sociopolitical systems that have "amplified and reworked existing social relations" (p.442). We explore how the sociopolitical aspects of social media platforms and digital sex work amplify and rework the sexist and racist hegemonic strategies employed by social media companies (Kelly, 1994).

In this study, we detail the experiences of Clark, an Afro-Latine sex worker, and the labor practices and tactics used to overcome digital erasure in a visual media economy that devalues all forms of sex work (Berg, 2022). Through narrative and thick description, we show that Black sex workers' digital practices are reshaping a sex work labor on a post backpage.com internet. Black femme digital social networks and tactics can strengthen the impact of Black femme activists' online labor and other digital practices. Sex work is labor, and we advocate for its decriminalization, urging equal protections and privileges for sex workers comparable to those in other industries in the United States.



The Collective Individualism of YouTube Makeup Reviews

Blake Hallinan, Tommaso Trillò, Saki Mizoroki, Rebecca Scharlach, Pyung Hwa Park, Avishai Green, Limor Shifman

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

Beauty is one of the most popular and lucrative segments on YouTube, with broad transnational appeal, making it an ideal site to investigate the relationship between commercialization, globalization, and digital platforms. We focus on makeup reviews to utilize established research on cross-cultural differences in reviewing and ask how cultural repertoires of evaluation compare across multiple languages. We collected popular makeup reviews using keyword searches in five languages—English, German, Italian, Japanese, and Korean—associated with diverse cultural contexts. The top 20 videos in each language (n=100) were selected for analysis, producing a group of successful channels. We employed content analysis to compare the videos’ evaluative criteria, using a codebook of ten values. We found that creators across languages employ a shared cultural repertoire to evaluate beauty products, concerned with aesthetics, functionality, pleasure, and, to a lesser extent, distinctiveness and economy. While beauty creators appeal to a consistent set of values, they rarely elaborate on their meaning, focus on positivity, and emphasize the subjectivity of their evaluations. We argue that the approach to evaluation in YouTube makeup reviews challenges previously observed dichotomies between Eastern and Western countries, blending elements of both collectivist and individualist communication styles. Most creators make indirect recommendations even as they use reviews to build a distinctive personal brand. Although further research is necessary to investigate the reach of this practice, our analysis of multi-lingual makeup reviews demonstrates how the homogenization of social media entertainment need not be synonymous with Westernization.



 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: AoIR2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.151
© 2001–2024 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany